- Details
-
Last Updated: Friday, 08 April 2016 10:16
-
Published: Friday, 08 April 2016 06:00
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISIONCase No. 2:09-cv-13616, Dennis Black, et al., Plaintiffs,
v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, Defendant:
ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S EMERGENCY
MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME
Having had years to prepare the required documents,
the PBGC yet again needs more time!
In an order just issued, Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub ruled:
(a) "Defendant will produce all documents in its possession related to an audit of the Plan’s assets as they are responsive to Plaintiffs’ Request for Production no. 12, without further objection, within ninety (90) days of the March 11, 2016 Order. Failure to comply with this deadline may result in sanctions; and
(b) Defendant will produce all of the approximately 30,000 documents that it had previously withheld on the basis of privilege, to the extent that it has not already done so, within thirty (30) days of the March 11, 2016 Order.
- Details
-
Last Updated: Tuesday, 14 June 2016 13:29
-
Published: Saturday, 12 March 2016 13:00
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case No. 2:09-cv-13616, Dennis Black, et al., Plaintiffs,
v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, Defendant:
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ RULE 37 MOTION TO ENFORCE COURT ORDER [275] AND DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY BRIEF [280]
In an order just issued, Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub ruled:
(a) "~Defendant has not produced all of the approximately 30,000 documents that it had previously withheld on the basis of privilege, it will do so within thirty (30) days of this Order. Failure to comply with this Order may result in sanctions; and
(b) Defendant will produce all documents in its possession related to an audit of the Plan’s assets as they are responsive to Plaintiffs’ Request for Production no. 12 within thirty (30) days of this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Reply Brief [280] is DENIED as moot."
Update June 14, 2016 – PBGC has finally provided documents in compliance with Judge Majzoub's order, documents are being reviewed by Delphi salaried retirees' attorneys.
- Details
-
Last Updated: Tuesday, 01 March 2016 19:59
-
Published: Tuesday, 01 March 2016 13:00
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case No. 2:09-cv-13616, Dennis Black, et al., Plaintiffs,
v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, Defendant:
BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL REPLY BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THEIR MOTION TO ENFORCE MAGISTRATE JUDGE MAJZOUB’S AUGUST 21, 2013 WAIVER ORDER
A brief submitted today highlights misleading information and delays by the PBGC, continuing to delay the execution of justice for the Delphi salaried retirees fighting to recover their full pensions.
- Details
-
Last Updated: Monday, 14 September 2015 21:21
-
Published: Monday, 14 September 2015 13:00
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION
Case No. 2:09-cv-13616, Dennis Black, et al., Plaintiffs,
v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, Defendant:
The following filings with the court show further delays by the PBGC continuing to decline to provide documents related to the Delphi salaried retirees attempts to recover their full pensions. These documents were ordered to be provided by
Judge Majzoub's Waiver Order dated August 21, 2013.
