What We Are Fighting For!

We are fighting to restore our full pension plan that we earned and are entitled to.  We are fighting to restore the pension plan completely, as though it had never been terminated: to restore all pension benefits, including any supplements, retroactive to when the plans were improperly terminated by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC), as well as full recovery of our legal costs.
We continue to seek equal treatment from Congress, just as retirees represented by labor unions have received from enactment of pension legislation benefiting them.  There is a bipartisan legislative effort to restore our pension plan.  President Biden's Administration itself has said that we deserve our pensions, and that congressional action will be required.  We very much appreciate the efforts of U.S. Representatives Dan Kildee, Mike Turner and Tim Ryan.
What happened to us was unfair:  Our hourly counterparts represented by the most powerful unions were chosen to be made whole on their pensions and receive monthly "top-ups" from GM (funded by federal taxpayers' TARP dollars).
What happened to us was inequitable:  We are the ONLY auto retirees, hourly or salaried, to have worked two thirds or more of our careers for a "Big Three" company to have lost our pensions -- in our case up to 70% or more -- AND lost 100% of our health care coverage, AND lost 100% of our life insurance.
We are profoundly disappointed that the U.S. Supreme Court declined on Jan. 18, 2022, to take up our case. We will never know why, but understand that the Court is asked to review many cases each year and only accepts a few.  The Supreme Court did not say it decided that the PBGC acted lawfully when it involuntarily terminated our pension plan.  We will always believe that the federal government did indeed break the law, and denied us our Constitutional Right of Due Process...
    • Because we had no representation in the closed-door negotiations, legal protections normally available to pensioners were skirted.
    • Liens on Delphi property that could have protected our pensions were surrendered by the PBGC for minimal value.
    • The PBGC claimed in 2009 that it had to seize our salaried pension plan, because the plan was "severely underfunded," but an independent study by the respected actuarial firm Watson Wyatt -- information available to the PBGC at the time – indicated that the plan was very adequately funded when it was terminated.  After reviewing the Watson Wyatt report, a second actuarial firm, Wells Fargo Company's BPS&M, has since noted that the salaried plan funding level was not only a healthy funding level, but was actually better funded than the average of the 100 largest private pension plans in the United States.
Life may not treat people fairly and equitably in all cases, but adherence to the law DOES apply to everyone ... even government officials.  This was the heart of our lawsuit, and we will never, never, never, never give up until our pension plan is operated as though it had never been terminated.
Supporting Data:  (click each chart to view)
Severe Financial Impact
Severe Financial Impact
Long Term Economic Losses